Jun
Two weeks ago, in a cocktail bar, I met a boy. A friend of a friend. I’d met him before (although briefly) on several other occasions (I sat next to him at a screening of The Goonies, once) but I didn’t really know him, I’d never really had a conversation with him. It’s pretty safe to say that while I knew his face, I didn’t at all know this person.
So there’s this boy that I don’t really know and he tells me that he’s read my blog. Apparently, quite a lot of it.
My brain immediately flicks back to all the stuff I’ve written at rarg. The break up with The Ex. Moving from one hated job to a brilliant one. Loosing friends. Starting companies. The 365 Project. Ending client relationships. The Square. Sex. Starting The List. The adventures at the bar. Adventures anywhere. There is about two years of juicy, intimate details right there, ready for a stranger to help themselves to.
I asked him what he’d read, and even before he answered I decided I didn’t really care what he’d read. That I was okay with what I’d written being public domain. Knowing that mostly, the last six months have been super emotional, super mad, and knowing that this was the way I figured things out, found clarity, and gained the support I got and still get from people was by making all that emotional muddle public. Was worth strangers knowing how I felt about my ex and our break up. How I felt about being single, and meeting new people and dancing those really ridiculous dating dances. About all the insecurities and outbursts and personal growth. Fuck it, really. I posted it all, and generally I was fine with that.
Then he got all vague and said he’d read ‘enough’. That was what I’d posted was brave, and honest and that was rare. He didn’t make any comments about my life, about what I written, about how I was feeling or the decisions I’d made. And that was enough to make me curious. That he wanted me to know that he’d read the intimate details about my life, but didn’t want to discuss them with me. He said he didn’t want to make me self-conscious. Curious.
So today, I went and re-read the last six months worth of posts.
And with a new perspective, I protected half of them. (If you’re curious too, email me and I’ll supply the password).
Last week I wrote post about stepping back, and taking time to figure things out (its the post with the whoopie cushion photo. Oh yeah, you remember that one.). I think this ties in nicely with this. Those old posts were a brilliant avenue for support and self-discovery. People from all over the place reached out and helped me find my feet, because I wrote so openly about what I felt. It was helpful for understanding what I felt, finding clarity in what I wanted, who I wanted to be and why.
But I’m on my feet now. I know what I want. And why. Mostly, I’ve figured some things out.
I think I’ll always blog about my life in some way or another (heres why) but like I said last week, I think I’m going to take a step back and hold some of these precious melodramtic moments for me.
And I think that’s less me being self-conscious. I’ll always be willing to talk openly and honestly about my past, with whoever. I think its more about me being a place that’s different from then. About being able to sit at a cocktail bar with a boy I don’t know, and have him not dance around knowing the intimate details of my past.
So, the last week or two has mostly been posts of moments. Museum visits. Kelly Tarltons. Nice happy, incredibly distant, less intimate posts about the adventures I’ve been part of.
And I met up with a friend who said, in passing, ‘pfft, that isn’t you, with your posts with no weight. You’re more than just pretty pictures, you know. That’s why people read what you write’.
Really? Do you really read what I write because I spill those intimate details, share the drama, and post videos of the tears I shed? Really?
I guess what I’m trying to say here, is that I’m still figuring it out. Writing posts with no substance is kind of difficult. And I’ll loose enthusiasm for blogging that way. In saying that, I’d prefer cute boys in cocktail bars asked me about my life, rather than read it from the internet. So where’s the line between what’s postable, and what’s not, hey?
What’s your rule of thumb?













Personally? I draw the line based on how other people are involved. If I wrote anonymously there would be a lot more posts about things people do that piss me off, but I hold most of that stuff back. I think of who’s reading (including sometimes my parents and other relatives) and what I’d be willing to say in conversation with them and let that be my guide. Where I really struggle is with sharing opinions about touchy parenting subjects that might piss off some of my friends. I don’t want to get myself in trouble, but I hate never taking a stance on anything. I regularly admonish myself for being too wimpy and not being myself, both in real life conversations and in print. I used to be a lot more balls out with my opinions, but I also got worn out from the blow back from that sort of behavior. I wish I could strike a better balance.
I’m with your friend — you’re more than pretty pictures and I love that. I really enjoy reading about your life and how you sort through all your dilemmas because it’s honest and relatable. But it can be a drag having folks know all your business. I understand and sympathize if you feel like you need to pull back, but personally? I like it just how it is.
I read because you are absolutely genuine, write beautifully and are unafraid to wear your heart on your sleeve. I know there are bloggers who post substanceless stuff ALL the TIME and get a million followers, and I know there are bloggers who write incredibly profound thoughts and experiences and get zilch. I think what’s more popular isn’t necessarily what you should be doing – both in blogging and in life; I like your photos and hearing about your moments, but I love hearing about a real soul exploring the ups and downs of life, love, heartache, wishes and dreams. Because that’s real – and you can’t beat that.
Love me, love my blog. I don’t protect NOTHING. ;-) (Ignore the double-negative, was trying for effect and failed miserably)
Truth be told, if someone can read about you in your unvarnished truth, in both your weakest moment as well as your strongest, and still like you.
They’re a keeper.
Elly, I think it’s really smart of you to feel that you can protect some of your posts. I think it’s great that you were reaching out to your readers and letting them know that you’re a human being, and I’m glad that they were able to help you with your journey.
My rule of thumb is basically, would I want someone close to me that I don’t particularly want to be friends with to know this stuff? I guess I’m a private person for the most part, and I don’t want to let too many people into the dirty details. But that doesn’t mean you have to censor yourself completely. Guage it how you see it.
I don’t write about EVERYTHING, but I am pretty honest… also? Some people think I am just leeeetle crazy. Overall I find honest blogging very freeing – if people still want to hang out with me after what they have read… then I couldn’t be happier and there is no need to pretend anymore. If they don’t… then we haven’t wasted anyones time to begin with. BUT… I currently don’t work.. AND my family doesn’t speak or read in English and I love it.
It is natural to grow and evolve as a blogger. With time you will change your style and with that you might lose some of your readers, but at the same time you will probably gain some new ones who don’t mind your less personal posts and are more into pictures. Such is life. Enjoy.